Node Smith, ND
A very interesting research study was conducted recently out of the University of Warwick, on how news stories about terrorism, disease outbreaks, natural disasters, and other potential threats are distorted to the point of hysteria when passed from person to person through social media channels.
Just like the old school game of telephone
Just like the elementary school game, “telephone,” where an original message is passed through whispers from person to person until the last person announces what they’ve heard, news stories are often distorted from original factual information when posted in social media walls, like Facebook, or pictures taken and short captions used in Instagram or twitter. This research study found that the manner in which news stories tend to be distorted is along the lines of becoming more negative, increasingly inaccurate as well as taking on a tone of hysteria when passed from person to person through social media.
A further element that was found in this study
A further element that was found in this study was that drawing attention back to the unbiased factual information of a news story does not seem to halt a growing panic around a news story.
This is the first research study to look into the impact of dread on the social amplification of threat, while at the same time looking at how re-exposure to neutral/factual information affects the social disbursement of information.
The study followed 154 participants on social media. The total group was divided into 14 chains of 8 people. The first person in the chain reading multiple neutral and factual news articles and then writing a message to the second person regarding the story. The second person then wrote a message to the next person until all eight members of the chain had been involved in the news thread.
When the sixth person received a message from the fifth person, it was sent with the original news story.
In all 14 chains, news stories that dealt with “dreaded” topics became more and more negative and tended towards fear and panic as it progressed through the message chain. Importantly, the effect of this distorted dread was not changed when the unbiased facts were presented to the sixth person. The neutral/original article had relatively zero impact on changing people’s negative outlook.
The author of the study, professor Thomas Hills from the University of Warwick’s Department of Psychology, commented:
“Society is an amplifier for risk”
“Society is an amplifier for risk. This research explains why our world looks increasingly threatening despite consistent reductions in real-world threats.
“It also shows that the more people share information, the further that information gets from the facts and the more resilient it becomes to correction.”
- Robert D. Jagiello, Thomas T. Hills. Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication. Risk Analysis, 2018; DOI: 10.1111/risa.13117
Image Copyright: <a href=’https://www.123rf.com/profile_nito500′>nito500 / 123RF Stock Photo</a>
Node Smith, ND, is a naturopathic physician in Portland, OR and associate editor for NDNR. He has been instrumental in maintaining a firm connection to the philosophy and heritage of naturopathic medicine among the next generation of docs. He helped found the first multi-generational experiential retreat, which brings elders, alumni, and students together for a weekend camp-out where naturopathic medicine and medical philosophy are experienced in nature. Four years ago he helped found the non-profit, Association for Naturopathic ReVitalization (ANR), for which he serves as the board chairman. ANR has a mission to inspire health practitioners to embody the naturopathic principles through experiential education. Node also has a firm belief that the next era of naturopathic medicine will see a resurgence of in-patient facilities which use fasting, earthing, hydrotherapy and homeopathy to bring people back from chronic diseases of modern living; he is involved in numerous conversations and projects to bring about this vision.